Skip to Main Content

VA IMPACT: Gabby Giffords on House Vote to Approve Concealed Carry Reciprocity   

 GIFFORDS ON CONGRESS: “I’m angry that when this country is begging for courage from our leaders, they are responding with cowardice” 

December 6, 2017 — Today, gun violence prevention advocates from Giffords, who co-founded her gun violence prevention organization with her husband, Captain Mark Kelly, denounced the House for voting to approve the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017. The legislation can now be taken up for a vote by the Senate.

Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, Co-Founder of Giffords:

Peter Ambler, Executive Director of Giffords:

“Representative Barbara Comstock just voted to weaken Virginia’s gun laws and allow out-of-state stalkers and domestic abusers to carry concealed weapons, despite overwhelming opposition from the people of Virginia. This vote makes clear she has little regard for the safety of Virginians. As Representative Comstock may have noticed in her state’s elections last November, voters are unforgiving of gun lobby lackeys and those who fail to demonstrate courage on gun safety. Giffords eagerly awaits 2018 and the opportunity to remind Virginia’s 8th Congressional District of Barbara Comstock’s vote to put lives at risk on behalf of the gun lobby.”

Related Fact Sheet: What Concealed Carry Reciprocity Means for Virginia 

EXPERTS AVAILABLE FOR COMMENT

GIFFORDS FACT SHEETS

GIFFORDS AD CAMPAIGN

Yesterday Giffords  launched ads focused on eight House members urging them to oppose the concealed carry bill. This is a six-figure buy includes television ads in two states – New Jersey and Minnesota – along with radio ads targeting several of the high profile Southern California districts that are in play, and digital ads in all eight districts.

LAW ENFORCEMENT OPPOSITION

If concealed carry reciprocity passes, law enforcement officers would face challenges in protecting such vulnerable populations and their communities. Due to the vast differences in the physical permit issued by each state – some look like official drivers’ licenses or passport cards, others look like paper library cards – officers would have no way to verify that an individual with an out-of-state concealed weapons permit is legally carrying a loaded firearm. Effectively, they would also be required to become legal experts concerning regulations in all 50 states to determine whether an individual is entitled to carry a concealed handgun. The House proposal, H.R. 38, goes even farther by imposing a threat of personal litigation against law enforcement officers should they attempt to enforce gun laws. As a result, officers would fear conducting a thorough investigation, deterring them from effectively doing their jobs and keeping our communities safe. Below are letters from law enforcement groups calling on Congress to oppose the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act:

LEADING ORGANIZATIONS OPPOSITION

Organizations concerned about public safety have been spending letters to Congress, calling on elected leaders to reject the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act.

ERODING STATES RIGHTS

While all states and DC have standards for carrying concealed firearms in their state,  12 states in the US have eliminated their permitting requirement. If this bill were to pass, residents of these 12 permitless carry states would not need a concealed carry permit to carry a concealed firearm anywhere in the country. The CCR bill would force states with strong requirements for obtaining concealed carry permits—like requiring firearm training, and passing background checks—to recognize concealed carry permits from states that have lower thresholds for obtaining firearms, including issuing them convicted stalkers and people with misdemeanors for domestic abuse.

This means that residents from a state like West Virginia (which is a permitless carry state) would be allowed to carry concealed firearms without a permit in a state like New Jersey, even though New Jersey’s standards for obtaining a concealed carry permit are much stricter. It’s why so many  law enforcement groups prosecutors, and  attorneys general concerned are opposed to the legislation — it fails to establish a consistent national standard for the requirements for who can safely carry a concealed gun.

To illustrate how this bill will impact specific states released a series of state fact sheets that show how the bill would weaken each state’s current laws if enacted:

###