Skip to Main Content
sample single Alt

Patterson, et al. v. Meta, et al.

Holding social media and gun companies accountable for their role in the racist
mass shooting at Tops Friendly Market in Buffalo.

    Last updated .

    Ten innocent Black people were murdered in a Buffalo grocery store by a shooter radicalized by social media. We’re suing the companies who let this happen.

    GIFFORDS Law Center, the Law Office of John V. Elmore, the Social Media Victims Law Center, and Belluck & Fox LLP represent the estates of Haywood Patterson, Katherine Massey, and Andre Mackniel, three Black residents of Buffalo, NY, who were murdered by a white supremacist on May 14, 2022, as they shopped for groceries at Tops Friendly Market. We also represent Latisha Rogers, an employee of the store who survived the shooting.

    The lawsuit was filed on May 12, 2023, against three members of the gun industry: Vintage Firearms, a store in upstate New York that sold the shooter an assault weapon with an easily removable magazine lock; MEAN, LLC, a company that sold what it purported to be a permanent magazine lock but that the shooter easily removed; and RMA Armament, which sold the shooter military-grade body armor.

    The lawsuit also names as defendants multiple social media companies whose products radicalized the shooter into a violent white supremacist beginning when he was in high school, including Meta, Snap, Alphabet, YouTube, Discord, Reddit, Amazon, and 4Chan.

    MEDIA REQUESTS

    Our experts can speak to the full spectrum of gun violence prevention issues. Have a question? Email us at media@giffords.org.

    Contact

    The Complaint

    Our complaint alleges that Vintage Firearms and RMA Armament negligently sold
    their products to the Tops shooter and that MEAN engaged in false advertising
    and deceptive conduct by selling a “lock” it claimed was permanent while
    simultaneously providing simple instructions on how to remove it.
    We also allege that the social media companies have designed defective
    products that harm minors via their algorithms and have failed to warn users
    about the addictive nature of social media products. We further allege that
    several of the social media companies were unjustly enriched by running
    advertisements next to a video of the Buffalo mass shooting.

    Our clients are seeking compensation for the physical and mental pain they and
    their loved ones have suffered, as well as injunctive relief, including but not
    limited to requiring the social media companies to remedy the unreasonably
    dangerous recommendation technologies in their products and to warn minor
    users and their parents about the addictive nature of their products.

    Status

    All but one of the defendants moved to dismiss the lawsuit soon after it was filed.
    The trial judge denied those motions in early 2024, and the defendants have
    appealed the court’s decisions.

    The case was filed in the Supreme Court of New York for Erie County.

    Key Filings

    MAKE A GIFT

    Every day, the experts at Giffords Law Center work tirelessly to craft, enact, and defend the gun safety policies and programs that save lives. A safer America is within reach, but we need your courage and commitment to get there.